A commentary highlighted by Global Research argues that the United States is engaged in a "hybrid" confrontation with Russia, China, and Iran rather than a conventional world war. In this framing, pressure is applied through a mix of political, economic, diplomatic, and informational tools instead of direct large-scale military conflict between the main powers.
The piece points to Russian analyst Ivan Timofeev, identified as a Valdai Club program director and head of the Russian International Affairs Council, as an important voice in this debate. It suggests that understanding the current standoff as a hybrid struggle could help Russian policymakers better assess risks and shape future responses.
From the article's perspective, the disputes involving Washington, Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran are not isolated episodes. Instead, they are presented as connected fronts within a broader geopolitical contest, with each side trying to gain leverage without crossing into full direct war.
The argument reflects a wider discussion in Russian foreign policy circles about how to interpret US strategy and the changing international order. By describing the rivalry in hybrid terms, the article places emphasis on long-term competition, coercive tools, and strategic planning rather than a single battlefield or one immediate crisis.
