Questions are mounting over a Gaza deal linked to Donald Trump, with the main issue being whether Israel and Hamas would actually follow through on its terms. The reported arrangement has drawn attention because any agreement in Gaza depends not just on headline promises, but on whether both sides accept the details and carry them out on the ground.
A central point of uncertainty is Hamas disarmament. Reports tied to the discussion suggest that Israeli officials see genuine disarmament as a key condition, and that troop withdrawals would not happen without it. That makes compliance the core test of the proposal, since disarmament is one of the most difficult and politically sensitive demands in the conflict.
The debate also reflects a wider problem with diplomacy around Gaza: even when a deal is announced, implementation can quickly become the hardest part. Israel and Hamas have sharply different goals, and any disagreement over timing, verification or security guarantees could slow or derail an agreement before it takes full effect.
For now, the focus is less on the announcement itself than on whether the two sides are prepared to meet its conditions. Until there is clearer evidence of movement on disarmament and military pullbacks, doubts about compliance are likely to remain at the center of the story.
