A New York Post opinion column by Michael Goodwin argues that JD Vance’s recent statements about Israel and Jeffrey Epstein are serious enough to hurt his chances of landing on the Republican ticket in 2028. The piece frames those remarks as politically damaging and difficult to explain for a party figure once seen as a rising national contender.
Goodwin writes that he initially viewed Donald Trump’s 2024 decision to choose Vance as a strong political move. According to the column, the Ohio senator brought appeal with Trump’s base and was considered useful in focusing on key Midwest swing states during the campaign.
The argument in the piece is that Vance’s standing has changed because of what Goodwin describes as baffling comments on two highly sensitive issues. While the trimmed article preview does not detail those statements, the headline makes clear that the columnist believes they raise broader questions about Vance’s judgment and future electability.
Taken together, the column presents a sharp reassessment of Vance’s role in Republican politics. A figure once praised for his political usefulness and connection to core GOP voters is now being portrayed, at least in this opinion piece, as a less certain choice for the party’s next presidential cycle.
