FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said ABC’s decision not to carry a recent speech by President Donald Trump live could play a role in the agency’s ongoing review of the network. His comments put new attention on how broadcast choices by major networks can intersect with federal oversight.

The speech at the center of the dispute included Trump’s claim that China had illegally obtained millions of voter files as part of an effort to influence the 2018 and 2020 elections. ABC did not air the address live, a programming decision that Carr indicated would not be ignored as regulators assess the broadcaster.

The remarks add a political dimension to the broader debate over media gatekeeping, editorial judgment and the responsibilities of television networks when handling high-profile presidential statements. Supporters of live carriage often argue viewers should hear such remarks in real time, while critics say networks also weigh accuracy, context and public interest.

Carr’s position is likely to intensify scrutiny of both the FCC’s role and ABC’s handling of politically sensitive coverage. It also underscores how disputes over election-related claims and media access continue to shape the relationship between regulators, broadcasters and national politics.